Note
Click here to download the full example code
Getting Started with Nested Tensors¶
Nested tensors generalize the shape of regular dense tensors, allowing for representation of ragged-sized data.
for a regular tensor, each dimension is regular and has a size
for a nested tensor, not all dimensions have regular sizes; some of them are ragged
Nested tensors are a natural solution for representing sequential data within various domains:
in NLP, sentences can have variable lengths, so a batch of sentences forms a nested tensor
in CV, images can have variable shapes, so a batch of images forms a nested tensor
In this tutorial, we will demonstrate basic usage of nested tensors and motivate their usefulness
for operating on sequential data of varying lengths with a real-world example. In particular,
they are invaluable for building transformers that can efficiently operate on ragged sequential
inputs. Below, we present an implementation of multi-head attention using nested tensors that,
combined usage of torch.compile
, out-performs operating naively on tensors with padding.
Nested tensors are currently a prototype feature and are subject to change.
import numpy as np
import timeit
import torch
import torch.nn.functional as F
from torch import nn
torch.manual_seed(1)
np.random.seed(1)
device = torch.device('cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu')
Nested tensor initialization¶
From the Python frontend, a nested tensor can be created from a list of tensors. We denote nt[i] as the ith tensor component of a nestedtensor.
nt = torch.nested.nested_tensor([torch.arange(12).reshape(
2, 6), torch.arange(18).reshape(3, 6)], dtype=torch.float, device=device)
print(f"{nt=}")
By padding every underlying tensor to the same shape, a nestedtensor can be converted to a regular tensor.
padded_out_tensor = torch.nested.to_padded_tensor(nt, padding=0.0)
print(f"{padded_out_tensor=}")
All tensors posses an attribute for determining if they are nested;
print(f"nt is nested: {nt.is_nested}")
print(f"padded_out_tensor is nested: {padded_out_tensor.is_nested}")
It is common to construct nestedtensors from batches of irregularly shaped tensors. i.e. dimension 0 is assumed to be the batch dimension. Indexing dimension 0 gives back the first underlying tensor component.
print("First underlying tensor component:", nt[0], sep='\n')
print("last column of 2nd underlying tensor component:", nt[1, :, -1], sep='\n')
# When indexing a nestedtensor's 0th dimension, the result is a regular tensor.
print(f"First underlying tensor component is nested: {nt[0].is_nested}")
An important note is that slicing in dimension 0 has not been supported yet. Which means it not currently possible to construct a view that combines the underlying tensor components.
Nested Tensor Operations¶
As each operation must be explicitly implemented for nestedtensors, operation coverage for nestedtensors is currently narrower than that of regular tensors. For now, only basic operations such as index, dropout, softmax, transpose, reshape, linear, bmm are covered. However, coverage is being expanded. If you need certain operations, please file an issue to help us prioritize coverage.
reshape
The reshape op is for changing the shape of a tensor. Its full semantics for regular tensors can be found here. For regular tensors, when specifying the new shape, a single dimension may be -1, in which case it is inferred from the remaining dimensions and the number of elements.
The semantics for nestedtensors are similar, except that -1 no longer infers.
Instead, it inherits the old size (here 2 for nt[0]
and 3 for nt[1]
).
-1 is the only legal size to specify for a jagged dimension.
nt_reshaped = nt.reshape(2, -1, 2, 3)
print(f"{nt_reshaped=}")
transpose
The transpose op is for swapping two dimensions of a tensor. Its full semantics can be found here. Note that for nestedtensors dimension 0 is special; it is assumed to be the batch dimension, so transposes involving nestedtensor dimension 0 are not supported.
nt_transposed = nt_reshaped.transpose(1, 2)
print(f"{nt_transposed=}")
others
Other operations have the same semantics as for regular tensors. Applying the operation on a nestedtensor is equivalent to applying the operation to the underlying tensor components, with the result being a nestedtensor as well.
nt_mm = torch.nested.nested_tensor([torch.randn((2, 3, 4)), torch.randn((2, 3, 5))], device=device)
nt3 = torch.matmul(nt_transposed, nt_mm)
print(f"Result of Matmul:\n {nt3}")
nt4 = F.dropout(nt3, 0.1)
print(f"Result of Dropout:\n {nt4}")
nt5 = F.softmax(nt4, -1)
print(f"Result of Softmax:\n {nt5}")
Why Nested Tensor¶
When data is sequential, it is often the case that each sample has a different length. For example, in a batch of sentences, each sentence has a different number of words. A common technique for handling varying sequences is to manually pad each data tensor to the same shape in order to form a batch. For example, we have 2 sentences with different lengths and a vocabulary In order to represent his as single tensor we pad with 0 to the max length in the batch.
sentences = [["goodbye", "padding"],
["embrace", "nested", "tensor"]]
vocabulary = {"goodbye": 1.0, "padding": 2.0,
"embrace": 3.0, "nested": 4.0, "tensor": 5.0}
padded_sentences = torch.tensor([[1.0, 2.0, 0.0],
[3.0, 4.0, 5.0]])
nested_sentences = torch.nested.nested_tensor([torch.tensor([1.0, 2.0]),
torch.tensor([3.0, 4.0, 5.0])])
print(f"{padded_sentences=}")
print(f"{nested_sentences=}")
This technique of padding a batch of data to its max length is not optimal. The padded data is not needed for computation and wastes memory by allocating larger tensors than necessary. Further, not all operations have the same semnatics when applied to padded data. For matrix multiplications in order to ignore the padded entries, one needs to pad with 0 while for softmax one has to pad with -inf to ignore specific entries. The primary objective of nested tensor is to facilitate operations on ragged data using the standard PyTorch tensor UX, thereby eliminating the need for inefficient and complex padding and masking.
padded_sentences_for_softmax = torch.tensor([[1.0, 2.0, float("-inf")],
[3.0, 4.0, 5.0]])
print(F.softmax(padded_sentences_for_softmax, -1))
print(F.softmax(nested_sentences, -1))
Let us take a look at a practical example: the multi-head attention component utilized in Transformers. We can implement this in such a way that it can operate on either padded or nested tensors.
class MultiHeadAttention(nn.Module):
"""
Computes multi-head attention. Supports nested or padded tensors.
Args:
E_q (int): Size of embedding dim for query
E_k (int): Size of embedding dim for key
E_v (int): Size of embedding dim for value
E_total (int): Total embedding dim of combined heads post input projection. Each head
has dim E_total // nheads
nheads (int): Number of heads
dropout_p (float, optional): Dropout probability. Default: 0.0
"""
def __init__(self, E_q: int, E_k: int, E_v: int, E_total: int,
nheads: int, dropout_p: float = 0.0):
super().__init__()
self.nheads = nheads
self.dropout_p = dropout_p
self.query_proj = nn.Linear(E_q, E_total)
self.key_proj = nn.Linear(E_k, E_total)
self.value_proj = nn.Linear(E_v, E_total)
E_out = E_q
self.out_proj = nn.Linear(E_total, E_out)
assert E_total % nheads == 0, "Embedding dim is not divisible by nheads"
self.E_head = E_total // nheads
def forward(self, query: torch.Tensor, key: torch.Tensor, value: torch.Tensor) -> torch.Tensor:
"""
Forward pass; runs the following process:
1. Apply input projection
2. Split heads and prepare for SDPA
3. Run SDPA
4. Apply output projection
Args:
query (torch.Tensor): query of shape (N, L_t, E_q)
key (torch.Tensor): key of shape (N, L_s, E_k)
value (torch.Tensor): value of shape (N, L_s, E_v)
Returns:
attn_output (torch.Tensor): output of shape (N, L_t, E_q)
"""
# Step 1. Apply input projection
# TODO: demonstrate packed projection
query = self.query_proj(query)
key = self.key_proj(key)
value = self.value_proj(value)
# Step 2. Split heads and prepare for SDPA
# reshape query, key, value to separate by head
# (N, L_t, E_total) -> (N, L_t, nheads, E_head) -> (N, nheads, L_t, E_head)
query = query.unflatten(-1, [self.nheads, self.E_head]).transpose(1, 2)
# (N, L_s, E_total) -> (N, L_s, nheads, E_head) -> (N, nheads, L_s, E_head)
key = key.unflatten(-1, [self.nheads, self.E_head]).transpose(1, 2)
# (N, L_s, E_total) -> (N, L_s, nheads, E_head) -> (N, nheads, L_s, E_head)
value = value.unflatten(-1, [self.nheads, self.E_head]).transpose(1, 2)
# Step 3. Run SDPA
# (N, nheads, L_t, E_head)
attn_output = F.scaled_dot_product_attention(
query, key, value, dropout_p=dropout_p, is_causal=True)
# (N, nheads, L_t, E_head) -> (N, L_t, nheads, E_head) -> (N, L_t, E_total)
attn_output = attn_output.transpose(1, 2).flatten(-2)
# Step 4. Apply output projection
# (N, L_t, E_total) -> (N, L_t, E_out)
attn_output = self.out_proj(attn_output)
return attn_output
set hyperparameters following the Transformer paper
N = 512
E_q, E_k, E_v, E_total = 512, 512, 512, 512
E_out = E_q
nheads = 8
except for dropout probability: set to 0 for correctness check
dropout_p = 0.0
Let us generate some realistic fake data from Zipf’s law.
def zipf_sentence_lengths(alpha: float, batch_size: int) -> torch.Tensor:
# generate fake corpus by unigram Zipf distribution
# from wikitext-2 corpus, we get rank "." = 3, "!" = 386, "?" = 858
sentence_lengths = np.empty(batch_size, dtype=int)
for ibatch in range(batch_size):
sentence_lengths[ibatch] = 1
word = np.random.zipf(alpha)
while word != 3 and word != 386 and word != 858:
sentence_lengths[ibatch] += 1
word = np.random.zipf(alpha)
return torch.tensor(sentence_lengths)
Create nested tensor batch inputs
def gen_batch(N, E_q, E_k, E_v, device):
# generate semi-realistic data using Zipf distribution for sentence lengths
sentence_lengths = zipf_sentence_lengths(alpha=1.2, batch_size=N)
# Note: the torch.jagged layout is a nested tensor layout that supports a single ragged
# dimension and works with torch.compile. The batch items each have shape (B, S*, D)
# where B = batch size, S* = ragged sequence length, and D = embedding dimension.
query = torch.nested.nested_tensor([
torch.randn(l.item(), E_q, device=device)
for l in sentence_lengths
], layout=torch.jagged)
key = torch.nested.nested_tensor([
torch.randn(s.item(), E_k, device=device)
for s in sentence_lengths
], layout=torch.jagged)
value = torch.nested.nested_tensor([
torch.randn(s.item(), E_v, device=device)
for s in sentence_lengths
], layout=torch.jagged)
return query, key, value, sentence_lengths
query, key, value, sentence_lengths = gen_batch(N, E_q, E_k, E_v, device)
Generate padded forms of query, key, value for comparison
def jagged_to_padded(jt, padding_val):
# TODO: do jagged -> padded directly when this is supported
return torch.nested.to_padded_tensor(
torch.nested.nested_tensor(list(jt.unbind())),
padding_val)
padded_query, padded_key, padded_value = (
jagged_to_padded(t, 0.0) for t in (query, key, value)
)
Construct the model
mha = MultiHeadAttention(E_q, E_k, E_v, E_total, nheads, dropout_p).to(device=device)
Check correctness and performance
def benchmark(func, *args, **kwargs):
torch.cuda.synchronize()
begin = timeit.default_timer()
output = func(*args, **kwargs)
torch.cuda.synchronize()
end = timeit.default_timer()
return output, (end - begin)
output_nested, time_nested = benchmark(mha, query, key, value)
output_padded, time_padded = benchmark(mha, padded_query, padded_key, padded_value)
# padding-specific step: remove output projection bias from padded entries for fair comparison
for i, entry_length in enumerate(sentence_lengths):
output_padded[i, entry_length:] = 0.0
print("=== without torch.compile ===")
print("nested and padded calculations differ by", (jagged_to_padded(output_nested, 0.0) - output_padded).abs().max().item())
print("nested tensor multi-head attention takes", time_nested, "seconds")
print("padded tensor multi-head attention takes", time_padded, "seconds")
# warm up compile first...
compiled_mha = torch.compile(mha)
compiled_mha(query, key, value)
# ...now benchmark
compiled_output_nested, compiled_time_nested = benchmark(
compiled_mha, query, key, value)
# warm up compile first...
compiled_mha(padded_query, padded_key, padded_value)
# ...now benchmark
compiled_output_padded, compiled_time_padded = benchmark(
compiled_mha, padded_query, padded_key, padded_value)
# padding-specific step: remove output projection bias from padded entries for fair comparison
for i, entry_length in enumerate(sentence_lengths):
compiled_output_padded[i, entry_length:] = 0.0
print("=== with torch.compile ===")
print("nested and padded calculations differ by", (jagged_to_padded(compiled_output_nested, 0.0) - compiled_output_padded).abs().max().item())
print("nested tensor multi-head attention takes", compiled_time_nested, "seconds")
print("padded tensor multi-head attention takes", compiled_time_padded, "seconds")
Note that without torch.compile
, the overhead of the python subclass nested tensor
can make it slower than the equivalent computation on padded tensors. However, once
torch.compile
is enabled, operating on nested tensors gives a multiple x speedup.
Avoiding wasted computation on padding becomes only more valuable as the percentage
of padding in the batch increases.
print(f"Nested speedup: {compiled_time_padded / compiled_time_nested:.3f}")
Conclusion¶
In this tutorial, we have learned how to perform basic operations with nested tensors and how implement multi-head attention for transformers in a way that avoids computation on padding. For more information, check out the docs for the torch.nested namespace.
Total running time of the script: ( 0 minutes 0.000 seconds)