Note
Click here to download the full example code
(beta) Building a Simple CPU Performance Profiler with FX¶
Created On: Mar 04, 2021 | Last Updated: Jan 16, 2024 | Last Verified: Not Verified
Author: James Reed
In this tutorial, we are going to use FX to do the following:
Capture PyTorch Python code in a way that we can inspect and gather statistics about the structure and execution of the code
Build out a small class that will serve as a simple performance “profiler”, collecting runtime statistics about each part of the model from actual runs.
For this tutorial, we are going to use the torchvision ResNet18 model for demonstration purposes.
import torch
import torch.fx
import torchvision.models as models
rn18 = models.resnet18()
rn18.eval()
ResNet(
(conv1): Conv2d(3, 64, kernel_size=(7, 7), stride=(2, 2), padding=(3, 3), bias=False)
(bn1): BatchNorm2d(64, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
(relu): ReLU(inplace=True)
(maxpool): MaxPool2d(kernel_size=3, stride=2, padding=1, dilation=1, ceil_mode=False)
(layer1): Sequential(
(0): BasicBlock(
(conv1): Conv2d(64, 64, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn1): BatchNorm2d(64, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
(relu): ReLU(inplace=True)
(conv2): Conv2d(64, 64, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn2): BatchNorm2d(64, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
)
(1): BasicBlock(
(conv1): Conv2d(64, 64, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn1): BatchNorm2d(64, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
(relu): ReLU(inplace=True)
(conv2): Conv2d(64, 64, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn2): BatchNorm2d(64, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
)
)
(layer2): Sequential(
(0): BasicBlock(
(conv1): Conv2d(64, 128, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(2, 2), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn1): BatchNorm2d(128, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
(relu): ReLU(inplace=True)
(conv2): Conv2d(128, 128, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn2): BatchNorm2d(128, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
(downsample): Sequential(
(0): Conv2d(64, 128, kernel_size=(1, 1), stride=(2, 2), bias=False)
(1): BatchNorm2d(128, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
)
)
(1): BasicBlock(
(conv1): Conv2d(128, 128, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn1): BatchNorm2d(128, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
(relu): ReLU(inplace=True)
(conv2): Conv2d(128, 128, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn2): BatchNorm2d(128, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
)
)
(layer3): Sequential(
(0): BasicBlock(
(conv1): Conv2d(128, 256, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(2, 2), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn1): BatchNorm2d(256, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
(relu): ReLU(inplace=True)
(conv2): Conv2d(256, 256, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn2): BatchNorm2d(256, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
(downsample): Sequential(
(0): Conv2d(128, 256, kernel_size=(1, 1), stride=(2, 2), bias=False)
(1): BatchNorm2d(256, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
)
)
(1): BasicBlock(
(conv1): Conv2d(256, 256, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn1): BatchNorm2d(256, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
(relu): ReLU(inplace=True)
(conv2): Conv2d(256, 256, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn2): BatchNorm2d(256, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
)
)
(layer4): Sequential(
(0): BasicBlock(
(conv1): Conv2d(256, 512, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(2, 2), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn1): BatchNorm2d(512, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
(relu): ReLU(inplace=True)
(conv2): Conv2d(512, 512, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn2): BatchNorm2d(512, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
(downsample): Sequential(
(0): Conv2d(256, 512, kernel_size=(1, 1), stride=(2, 2), bias=False)
(1): BatchNorm2d(512, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
)
)
(1): BasicBlock(
(conv1): Conv2d(512, 512, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn1): BatchNorm2d(512, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
(relu): ReLU(inplace=True)
(conv2): Conv2d(512, 512, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
(bn2): BatchNorm2d(512, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
)
)
(avgpool): AdaptiveAvgPool2d(output_size=(1, 1))
(fc): Linear(in_features=512, out_features=1000, bias=True)
)
Now that we have our model, we want to inspect deeper into its performance. That is, for the following invocation, which parts of the model are taking the longest?
input = torch.randn(5, 3, 224, 224)
output = rn18(input)
A common way of answering that question is to go through the program source, add code that collects timestamps at various points in the program, and compare the difference between those timestamps to see how long the regions between the timestamps take.
That technique is certainly applicable to PyTorch code, however it would be nicer if we didn’t have to copy over model code and edit it, especially code we haven’t written (like this torchvision model). Instead, we are going to use FX to automate this “instrumentation” process without needing to modify any source.
First, let’s get some imports out of the way (we will be using all of these later in the code).
import statistics, tabulate, time
from typing import Any, Dict, List
from torch.fx import Interpreter
Note
tabulate is an external library that is not a dependency of PyTorch.
We will be using it to more easily visualize performance data. Please
make sure you’ve installed it from your favorite Python package source.
Capturing the Model with Symbolic Tracing¶
Next, we are going to use FX’s symbolic tracing mechanism to capture the definition of our model in a data structure we can manipulate and examine.
traced_rn18 = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(rn18)
print(traced_rn18.graph)
graph():
%x : torch.Tensor [num_users=1] = placeholder[target=x]
%conv1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=conv1](args = (%x,), kwargs = {})
%bn1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=bn1](args = (%conv1,), kwargs = {})
%relu : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=relu](args = (%bn1,), kwargs = {})
%maxpool : [num_users=2] = call_module[target=maxpool](args = (%relu,), kwargs = {})
%layer1_0_conv1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer1.0.conv1](args = (%maxpool,), kwargs = {})
%layer1_0_bn1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer1.0.bn1](args = (%layer1_0_conv1,), kwargs = {})
%layer1_0_relu : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer1.0.relu](args = (%layer1_0_bn1,), kwargs = {})
%layer1_0_conv2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer1.0.conv2](args = (%layer1_0_relu,), kwargs = {})
%layer1_0_bn2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer1.0.bn2](args = (%layer1_0_conv2,), kwargs = {})
%add : [num_users=1] = call_function[target=operator.add](args = (%layer1_0_bn2, %maxpool), kwargs = {})
%layer1_0_relu_1 : [num_users=2] = call_module[target=layer1.0.relu](args = (%add,), kwargs = {})
%layer1_1_conv1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer1.1.conv1](args = (%layer1_0_relu_1,), kwargs = {})
%layer1_1_bn1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer1.1.bn1](args = (%layer1_1_conv1,), kwargs = {})
%layer1_1_relu : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer1.1.relu](args = (%layer1_1_bn1,), kwargs = {})
%layer1_1_conv2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer1.1.conv2](args = (%layer1_1_relu,), kwargs = {})
%layer1_1_bn2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer1.1.bn2](args = (%layer1_1_conv2,), kwargs = {})
%add_1 : [num_users=1] = call_function[target=operator.add](args = (%layer1_1_bn2, %layer1_0_relu_1), kwargs = {})
%layer1_1_relu_1 : [num_users=2] = call_module[target=layer1.1.relu](args = (%add_1,), kwargs = {})
%layer2_0_conv1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer2.0.conv1](args = (%layer1_1_relu_1,), kwargs = {})
%layer2_0_bn1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer2.0.bn1](args = (%layer2_0_conv1,), kwargs = {})
%layer2_0_relu : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer2.0.relu](args = (%layer2_0_bn1,), kwargs = {})
%layer2_0_conv2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer2.0.conv2](args = (%layer2_0_relu,), kwargs = {})
%layer2_0_bn2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer2.0.bn2](args = (%layer2_0_conv2,), kwargs = {})
%layer2_0_downsample_0 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer2.0.downsample.0](args = (%layer1_1_relu_1,), kwargs = {})
%layer2_0_downsample_1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer2.0.downsample.1](args = (%layer2_0_downsample_0,), kwargs = {})
%add_2 : [num_users=1] = call_function[target=operator.add](args = (%layer2_0_bn2, %layer2_0_downsample_1), kwargs = {})
%layer2_0_relu_1 : [num_users=2] = call_module[target=layer2.0.relu](args = (%add_2,), kwargs = {})
%layer2_1_conv1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer2.1.conv1](args = (%layer2_0_relu_1,), kwargs = {})
%layer2_1_bn1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer2.1.bn1](args = (%layer2_1_conv1,), kwargs = {})
%layer2_1_relu : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer2.1.relu](args = (%layer2_1_bn1,), kwargs = {})
%layer2_1_conv2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer2.1.conv2](args = (%layer2_1_relu,), kwargs = {})
%layer2_1_bn2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer2.1.bn2](args = (%layer2_1_conv2,), kwargs = {})
%add_3 : [num_users=1] = call_function[target=operator.add](args = (%layer2_1_bn2, %layer2_0_relu_1), kwargs = {})
%layer2_1_relu_1 : [num_users=2] = call_module[target=layer2.1.relu](args = (%add_3,), kwargs = {})
%layer3_0_conv1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer3.0.conv1](args = (%layer2_1_relu_1,), kwargs = {})
%layer3_0_bn1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer3.0.bn1](args = (%layer3_0_conv1,), kwargs = {})
%layer3_0_relu : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer3.0.relu](args = (%layer3_0_bn1,), kwargs = {})
%layer3_0_conv2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer3.0.conv2](args = (%layer3_0_relu,), kwargs = {})
%layer3_0_bn2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer3.0.bn2](args = (%layer3_0_conv2,), kwargs = {})
%layer3_0_downsample_0 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer3.0.downsample.0](args = (%layer2_1_relu_1,), kwargs = {})
%layer3_0_downsample_1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer3.0.downsample.1](args = (%layer3_0_downsample_0,), kwargs = {})
%add_4 : [num_users=1] = call_function[target=operator.add](args = (%layer3_0_bn2, %layer3_0_downsample_1), kwargs = {})
%layer3_0_relu_1 : [num_users=2] = call_module[target=layer3.0.relu](args = (%add_4,), kwargs = {})
%layer3_1_conv1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer3.1.conv1](args = (%layer3_0_relu_1,), kwargs = {})
%layer3_1_bn1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer3.1.bn1](args = (%layer3_1_conv1,), kwargs = {})
%layer3_1_relu : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer3.1.relu](args = (%layer3_1_bn1,), kwargs = {})
%layer3_1_conv2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer3.1.conv2](args = (%layer3_1_relu,), kwargs = {})
%layer3_1_bn2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer3.1.bn2](args = (%layer3_1_conv2,), kwargs = {})
%add_5 : [num_users=1] = call_function[target=operator.add](args = (%layer3_1_bn2, %layer3_0_relu_1), kwargs = {})
%layer3_1_relu_1 : [num_users=2] = call_module[target=layer3.1.relu](args = (%add_5,), kwargs = {})
%layer4_0_conv1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.0.conv1](args = (%layer3_1_relu_1,), kwargs = {})
%layer4_0_bn1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.0.bn1](args = (%layer4_0_conv1,), kwargs = {})
%layer4_0_relu : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.0.relu](args = (%layer4_0_bn1,), kwargs = {})
%layer4_0_conv2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.0.conv2](args = (%layer4_0_relu,), kwargs = {})
%layer4_0_bn2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.0.bn2](args = (%layer4_0_conv2,), kwargs = {})
%layer4_0_downsample_0 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.0.downsample.0](args = (%layer3_1_relu_1,), kwargs = {})
%layer4_0_downsample_1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.0.downsample.1](args = (%layer4_0_downsample_0,), kwargs = {})
%add_6 : [num_users=1] = call_function[target=operator.add](args = (%layer4_0_bn2, %layer4_0_downsample_1), kwargs = {})
%layer4_0_relu_1 : [num_users=2] = call_module[target=layer4.0.relu](args = (%add_6,), kwargs = {})
%layer4_1_conv1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.1.conv1](args = (%layer4_0_relu_1,), kwargs = {})
%layer4_1_bn1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.1.bn1](args = (%layer4_1_conv1,), kwargs = {})
%layer4_1_relu : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.1.relu](args = (%layer4_1_bn1,), kwargs = {})
%layer4_1_conv2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.1.conv2](args = (%layer4_1_relu,), kwargs = {})
%layer4_1_bn2 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.1.bn2](args = (%layer4_1_conv2,), kwargs = {})
%add_7 : [num_users=1] = call_function[target=operator.add](args = (%layer4_1_bn2, %layer4_0_relu_1), kwargs = {})
%layer4_1_relu_1 : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=layer4.1.relu](args = (%add_7,), kwargs = {})
%avgpool : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=avgpool](args = (%layer4_1_relu_1,), kwargs = {})
%flatten : [num_users=1] = call_function[target=torch.flatten](args = (%avgpool, 1), kwargs = {})
%fc : [num_users=1] = call_module[target=fc](args = (%flatten,), kwargs = {})
return fc
This gives us a Graph representation of the ResNet18 model. A Graph
consists of a series of Nodes connected to each other. Each Node
represents a call-site in the Python code (whether to a function,
a module, or a method) and the edges (represented as args and kwargs
on each node) represent the values passed between these call-sites. More
information about the Graph representation and the rest of FX’s APIs ca
be found at the FX documentation https://pytorch.org/docs/master/fx.html.
Creating a Profiling Interpreter¶
Next, we are going to create a class that inherits from torch.fx.Interpreter.
Though the GraphModule that symbolic_trace produces compiles Python code
that is run when you call a GraphModule, an alternative way to run a
GraphModule is by executing each Node in the Graph one by one. That is
the functionality that Interpreter provides: It interprets the graph node-
by-node.
By inheriting from Interpreter, we can override various functionality and
install the profiling behavior we want. The goal is to have an object to which
we can pass a model, invoke the model 1 or more times, then get statistics about
how long the model and each part of the model took during those runs.
Let’s define our ProfilingInterpreter class:
class ProfilingInterpreter(Interpreter):
def __init__(self, mod : torch.nn.Module):
# Rather than have the user symbolically trace their model,
# we're going to do it in the constructor. As a result, the
# user can pass in any ``Module`` without having to worry about
# symbolic tracing APIs
gm = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(mod)
super().__init__(gm)
# We are going to store away two things here:
#
# 1. A list of total runtimes for ``mod``. In other words, we are
# storing away the time ``mod(...)`` took each time this
# interpreter is called.
self.total_runtime_sec : List[float] = []
# 2. A map from ``Node`` to a list of times (in seconds) that
# node took to run. This can be seen as similar to (1) but
# for specific sub-parts of the model.
self.runtimes_sec : Dict[torch.fx.Node, List[float]] = {}
######################################################################
# Next, let's override our first method: ``run()``. ``Interpreter``'s ``run``
# method is the top-level entry point for execution of the model. We will
# want to intercept this so that we can record the total runtime of the
# model.
def run(self, *args) -> Any:
# Record the time we started running the model
t_start = time.time()
# Run the model by delegating back into Interpreter.run()
return_val = super().run(*args)
# Record the time we finished running the model
t_end = time.time()
# Store the total elapsed time this model execution took in the
# ``ProfilingInterpreter``
self.total_runtime_sec.append(t_end - t_start)
return return_val
######################################################################
# Now, let's override ``run_node``. ``Interpreter`` calls ``run_node`` each
# time it executes a single node. We will intercept this so that we
# can measure and record the time taken for each individual call in
# the model.
def run_node(self, n : torch.fx.Node) -> Any:
# Record the time we started running the op
t_start = time.time()
# Run the op by delegating back into Interpreter.run_node()
return_val = super().run_node(n)
# Record the time we finished running the op
t_end = time.time()
# If we don't have an entry for this node in our runtimes_sec
# data structure, add one with an empty list value.
self.runtimes_sec.setdefault(n, [])
# Record the total elapsed time for this single invocation
# in the runtimes_sec data structure
self.runtimes_sec[n].append(t_end - t_start)
return return_val
######################################################################
# Finally, we are going to define a method (one which doesn't override
# any ``Interpreter`` method) that provides us a nice, organized view of
# the data we have collected.
def summary(self, should_sort : bool = False) -> str:
# Build up a list of summary information for each node
node_summaries : List[List[Any]] = []
# Calculate the mean runtime for the whole network. Because the
# network may have been called multiple times during profiling,
# we need to summarize the runtimes. We choose to use the
# arithmetic mean for this.
mean_total_runtime = statistics.mean(self.total_runtime_sec)
# For each node, record summary statistics
for node, runtimes in self.runtimes_sec.items():
# Similarly, compute the mean runtime for ``node``
mean_runtime = statistics.mean(runtimes)
# For easier understanding, we also compute the percentage
# time each node took with respect to the whole network.
pct_total = mean_runtime / mean_total_runtime * 100
# Record the node's type, name of the node, mean runtime, and
# percent runtime.
node_summaries.append(
[node.op, str(node), mean_runtime, pct_total])
# One of the most important questions to answer when doing performance
# profiling is "Which op(s) took the longest?". We can make this easy
# to see by providing sorting functionality in our summary view
if should_sort:
node_summaries.sort(key=lambda s: s[2], reverse=True)
# Use the ``tabulate`` library to create a well-formatted table
# presenting our summary information
headers : List[str] = [
'Op type', 'Op', 'Average runtime (s)', 'Pct total runtime'
]
return tabulate.tabulate(node_summaries, headers=headers)
Note
We use Python’s time.time function to pull wall clock
timestamps and compare them. This is not the most accurate
way to measure performance, and will only give us a first-
order approximation. We use this simple technique only for the
purpose of demonstration in this tutorial.
Investigating the Performance of ResNet18¶
We can now use ProfilingInterpreter to inspect the performance
characteristics of our ResNet18 model;
interp = ProfilingInterpreter(rn18)
interp.run(input)
print(interp.summary(True))
Op type Op Average runtime (s) Pct total runtime
------------- --------------------- --------------------- -------------------
call_module maxpool 0.00572491 8.96372
call_module conv1 0.00477934 7.4832
call_module layer4_0_conv2 0.00381088 5.96685
call_module layer1_1_conv2 0.00333261 5.21801
call_module layer1_0_conv1 0.00307107 4.8085
call_module layer4_1_conv1 0.00306797 4.80364
call_module layer4_1_conv2 0.00306416 4.79767
call_module layer1_0_conv2 0.00294185 4.60617
call_module layer2_1_conv1 0.00292993 4.5875
call_module layer1_1_conv1 0.0029211 4.57369
call_module layer3_1_conv2 0.0027585 4.3191
call_module layer3_1_conv1 0.00271082 4.24444
call_module layer3_0_conv2 0.00263524 4.1261
call_module layer2_1_conv2 0.00254607 3.98649
call_module layer2_0_conv2 0.00237751 3.72256
call_module layer4_0_conv1 0.00217199 3.40078
call_module layer3_0_conv1 0.00170159 2.66425
call_module bn1 0.00153255 2.39958
call_module layer2_0_conv1 0.00143242 2.2428
call_module layer2_0_downsample_0 0.000998735 1.56376
call_module layer4_0_downsample_0 0.000456572 0.714872
call_module layer3_0_downsample_0 0.000449896 0.70442
call_function add_1 0.000436783 0.683888
call_function add 0.000425816 0.666716
call_function add_3 0.000258923 0.405405
call_module relu 0.000218868 0.342691
call_module layer1_0_bn1 0.000174522 0.273257
call_module fc 0.00017333 0.27139
call_module layer1_1_bn2 0.000169992 0.266164
call_module layer1_1_bn1 0.000154018 0.241153
call_module layer1_0_bn2 0.000153303 0.240033
call_module avgpool 0.000150442 0.235553
call_module layer2_1_bn1 0.000135899 0.212782
call_module layer2_0_downsample_1 0.000130653 0.204569
call_module layer2_0_bn2 0.000127792 0.20009
call_module layer3_1_bn1 0.0001266 0.198223
call_module layer2_0_bn1 0.000122786 0.19225
call_module layer2_1_bn2 0.000122786 0.19225
call_module layer3_1_bn2 0.00011754 0.184038
call_module layer4_0_bn2 0.000116348 0.182171
call_module layer3_0_bn2 0.000113249 0.177318
call_module layer3_0_downsample_1 0.000112772 0.176572
call_module layer3_0_bn1 0.000112295 0.175825
call_module layer4_0_bn1 0.000112057 0.175452
call_module layer4_1_bn1 0.000112057 0.175452
call_module layer4_0_downsample_1 0.000111341 0.174332
call_module layer1_0_relu 0.000110149 0.172465
call_module layer4_1_bn2 0.000109434 0.171345
call_module layer1_0_relu_1 9.82285e-05 0.1538
call_module layer1_1_relu_1 9.58443e-05 0.150067
call_module layer1_1_relu 9.44138e-05 0.147827
call_function add_2 8.03471e-05 0.125803
call_module layer2_1_relu 7.9155e-05 0.123936
call_module layer4_0_relu 7.89165e-05 0.123563
call_module layer2_0_relu 7.84397e-05 0.122816
call_module layer2_1_relu_1 7.84397e-05 0.122816
call_module layer4_1_relu 7.77245e-05 0.121696
call_module layer2_0_relu_1 7.55787e-05 0.118337
call_module layer4_1_relu_1 7.39098e-05 0.115723
call_module layer3_1_relu 7.20024e-05 0.112737
call_module layer4_0_relu_1 7.00951e-05 0.109751
call_function add_6 6.96182e-05 0.109004
call_module layer3_0_relu_1 6.93798e-05 0.108631
call_module layer3_0_relu 6.91414e-05 0.108257
call_module layer3_1_relu_1 6.84261e-05 0.107138
call_function add_5 6.79493e-05 0.106391
call_function add_4 6.60419e-05 0.103405
call_function add_7 6.48499e-05 0.101538
call_function flatten 4.14848e-05 0.0649545
placeholder x 2.69413e-05 0.0421831
output output 1.78814e-05 0.0279976
There are two things we should call out here:
MaxPool2dtakes up the most time. This is a known issue: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/51393BatchNorm2d also takes up significant time. We can continue this line of thinking and optimize this in the Conv-BN Fusion with FX tutorial.
Conclusion¶
As we can see, using FX we can easily capture PyTorch programs (even ones we don’t have the source code for!) in a machine-interpretable format and use that for analysis, such as the performance analysis we’ve done here. FX opens up an exciting world of possibilities for working with PyTorch programs.
Finally, since FX is still in beta, we would be happy to hear any feedback you have about using it. Please feel free to use the PyTorch Forums (https://discuss.pytorch.org/) and the issue tracker (https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues) to provide any feedback you might have.
Total running time of the script: ( 0 minutes 0.424 seconds)
